Dec 19, 2025 ~ "The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors."
Another hoax blows up in the Democrat's face. Like the Russia Hoax and the Ukraine Hoax and many other scams and smears, they pushed this lie hard trying make the public believe that Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes. There was never any proof so they released photos redacted to imply guilt and many doctored or AI photos were also forwarded around social media.
In the end, even the #FakeNews @nytimes, who would have LOVED there to be real evidence to publish about Trump crimes, had to admit there was none. If the Democrats really had any evidence, we would have seen it long ago. Starting with the fake Plamegate in 2003, they move from one hoax to the next, never having any real evidence of crimes, but using the complicity of the #FakeNews, they can create the illusion of criminality and corruption in the new cycle, sometimes for years, leaving many ignorant voters and low information voters with the impression that there must be something to these cases. There never is. [Fake News, Lawfare, Loathsome Left, Trump Win]
Dec 22, 2025 ~ 'Hey Boomers and Gen X, if You Think DEI Has Been Bad for You, Ask a Millennial or Gen Z Guy'
"Over time, the drive to 'diversify' the workplace, elite institutions, or even the police and fire departments would create problems, but the chances that anybody you know would be directly harmed seemed small. That's not true anymore, and especially not so for the younger generations who are getting creamed in the job market, or for the rest of us as our important institutions become filled with incompetents or ideologically-driven nincompoops."
"Younger people—especially white, heterosexual men—are now being denied opportunities en masse because of their immutable characteristics. What was a fringe problem as I moved up in the world is now the dominant fact of life for millions of younger men, and will even be more so for the kids who are being educated in schools and universities that are populated by the DEI-obsessed."
"If 80% of your old hires are white men and you want to 'diversify,' hiring more white men, even if they are the best for the job, is a bad move. If a 'diverse' person leaves, they must be replaced with a 'diverse' person. If a position opens, it's a prime opportunity to increase 'balance' or even overcorrect. Many institutions that used to be dominated by white males have relegated them to minority status."
“For a typical job we’d get a couple hundred applications, probably at least 80 from white guys,” the hiring editor recalled. “It was a given that we weren’t gonna hire the best person… It was jarring how we would talk about excluding white guys.” "The pipeline hadn’t changed much—white men were still nearly half the applicants—but they were now filling closer to 10 percent of open positions."
"Suddenly, in Andrew’s newsroom, everything was driven by identity. There were endless diversity trainings, a racial “climate” assessment—at one point, reporters were told they had to catalog, in minute detail, the identity characteristics of all their sources. Andrew had been instrumental in forming the union at his company, and objected when negotiations shifted from severance pay and parental leave to demands for racial quotas. “They wanted to do like ... emergency hires of black people,” he said.
When he questioned these new priorities, the response was swift. “On a Zoom call, women would clap back at something I was saying and other women would snap their fingers in the [chat] window,” he recalled. “It was this whole subcultural language being introduced wholesale.”
"The Atlantic announced that three-quarters of editorial hires in the past year had been women and 69 percent people of color. The irony was, where older white men remained in charge, especially where they remained in charge, there was almost no room to move up. “If you hired a team of white guys around you, you were putting a target on your back,” recalled the hiring editor. At The New York Times Magazine (one of the few prestige magazines with a public masthead), Jake Silverstein, a Gen-X white man, serves as editor-in-chief, and Bill Wasik, another Gen-X white man, serves as editorial director. But of nine millennial senior editors and story editors below them, there’s just one white guy—and he’s been there since 2012, effectively grandfathered in."
"Since 2020, only 7.7 percent of Los Angeles Times interns have been white men. Between 2018 and 2024, of the roughly 30 summer interns each year at The Washington Post, just two or three were white men (in 2025, coincident with certain political shifts, the Post’s intern class had seven white guys—numbers not seen since way back in 2014). In 2018 The New York Times replaced its summer internship with a year-long fellowship. Just 10 percent of the nearly 220 fellows have been white men. Other pipelines dried up as well. The alt-weeklies that gave misfit young men their start have shed them entirely. There are no white men on the editorial staff of the Seattle Stranger or on the staff of Indy Week. As late as 2017, there were six white men atop the masthead for the Portland Mercury. By 2024, there was just one: the Boomer editor-in-chief."
"But nothing explains the New Media story quite like Vox, whose explainers dominated 2010s discourse and whose internal demographics capture the decade’s professional shift. Back in 2013, when Ezra Klein came under fire for his start-up’s lack of diversity, Vox Media was 82 percent male and 88 percent white. By 2022 the company was just 37 percent male and 59 percent white, and by 2025 leadership was 73 percent female." And it keeps getting worse.
"We were handed a country that, for all its flaws, was created on a foundation that promised ever-increasing social justice. I was born when the civil rights movement was making real strides, and have watched this country transform from one that suppressed 'people of color' to one that now suppresses people of pallor. The latter doesn't correct for the former." [Affirmative Action, CRT DIE Wokeness, Loathsome Left]
Dec 27, 2025 ~ 'History Will Judge Today’s Gender-Affirming Wokesters Harshly' "Here’s news for the wokester advocates: Increasing evidence shows that gender dysphoria often is a situation that eventually passes. Most children grow out of it. Among those who do have such inclinations, many are simply gay. They are not candidates for changing their gender so that they'll somehow have a better life. Those in positions of authority, certainly within our educational institutions, have exceeded the bounds of prudence, caution, and science. " "As more and more evidence emerges that sex change operations and the lifestyles that such victims must endure don't pan out, how will today's advocates of such changes be judged in the future? In a word: harshly." "Emerging studies reveal that most of those who undergo sex reassignment procedures do not achieve the inner peace and satisfaction that they had sought. Instead, they learn the exceedingly hard way that the procedures done to them are permanent, far less than satisfying, and, in many cases, doom them to an existence that they could not have previously imagined." "In the coming decades, those who were advocates of this mania and unduly influenced children and teens based on a Leftist agenda, and not based on what was good for the individual, will be seen for what they are. Those who made money off of such medical procedures, in particular, will be judged for what they did. Those who have corrupted the hearts and minds of the children they were entrusted to protect will be held in low esteem." "The term 'gender-affirming care' will fall out of favor and will be regarded as despicable pseudoscience perpetrated by Leftist zealots." [Anti-Science, Health Care, Loathsome Left, Trans]